“I Will Kill Him For The Future:" Trump’s Mass Pardon of White Nationalists Turned Into a Death Warrant for Hakeem Jeffries

They told us this would happen.

Months ago, experts warned that when Donald Trump issued mass pardons of the 1500 white-nationalist foot soldiers of January 6, he was deputizing them. They said clemency would embolden violent extremists and that men radicalized by lies of stolen elections and racial grievance would not walk out contrite but swagger out as soldiers released back to the field.

Analysts from the Brennan Center for Justice called Trump’s blanket pardon of the January 6 insurrectionists “a betrayal of law enforcement that once again puts police officers, as well as government officials, journalists, and communities across the country at greater risk.”

A day after the mass pardon, the Associated Press flagged the same danger: “Experts worry that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons will legitimize political violence, embolden extremists.” Reuters put it bluntly in a headline: “Trump’s pardons will embolden Proud Boys, other far-right groups, say experts.”

Emboldened and brazen, some of the rioters said it loud and to our faces that they weren’t sorry. They promised a sequel.

A California Proud Boys chapter posted on Telegram: “We’ll never forget, we’ll never forgive. You can’t get rid of us.” A pardoned rioter blasted on X: “You are on notice. This is not going to end well for you.” Enrique Tarrio, freed by the pardon, slithered onto Alex Jones’s show not to repent but to roar that “they need to feel the heat.” Those weren’t quiet words of contrition. They were rallying cries from men who’d been re-commissioned with a presidential blessing.

And now the prediction has a face.

Christopher Moynihan, 34, once convicted for storming the Capitol and swept back into the world by that clemency, is charged with threatening to assassinate House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries. He typed out a promise: “Hakeem Jeffries makes a speech in a few days in NYC I cannot allow this terrorist to live” and “Even if I am hated he must be eliminated. I will kill him for the future.”

“Kill him for the future.” Listen to that. This man isn’t fantasizing, he’s auditioning to be a sacrificial agent purging the present so a particular, racialized vision of America can breathe.

When this racist president wiped these rioter’s records, he did more than erase their sentences. He sent a juridical benediction to a subculture steeped in white grievance and racialized conspiracism. These were not peaceful demonstrators. They carried Confederate flags through the halls of Congress, smeared feces on the walls and pissed on furniture, dragged a guillotine onto federal grounds, dressed in medieval headdresses, and built a hanging gallows where they chanted for the hanging of the vice president. The imagery was ancestral. They resurrected the symbols of white terror and spectacle violence and the same theater of domination that once defined America’s public square.

And those rioters walked out baptized and convinced that history has their back. “For the future” is a threat. It’s a political creed that means violence is holy and murder is the price of racial preservation and the highest office has become an instrument for legitimizing terror. And the Oval Office has become an altar where white terror is consecrated.

This isn’t random political nastiness, it is racial political terror aimed at re-inscribing a white order. Hakeem Jeffries’s race and rank make him a lightning rod for white-supremacist rage, and the threatened violence against him is both a personal danger and a political message.

These violent white men want to reopen the old grammar of terror that once kept Black political power in check. His very presence at the top of Congress is intolerable to those who believe the nation’s future must look like its past, which means white, patriarchal, and unchallenged. For men like Moynihan, a Black man wielding authority over the machinery of government upends the racial hierarchy they were taught to guard, the one that defines their manhood, citizenship, and even their god.

To target Hakeem Jeffries is to try to restore that order through violence the same way lynch mobs once did when Black success or leadership dared to breach the boundaries of white comfort. The assassination threat is a continuation, not a break from the noose and the fire. It’s how white terror has always worked in America to punish the audacity of Black ascendancy.

The threat against Jeffries is the predictable and intended downstream of Trump’s pardon strategy. What happened here wasn’t a mistake. It was a deliberate political calculation. On Day One, the White House wiped away sentences and called it “national reconciliation.” Trump’s pardon was supposed to be a public, theatrical absolution that returned 1500 degenerates from the margins and handed them a clean sheet.

Remember, this mass absolution came from a man who has never once condemned the Proud Boys or the neo-Nazis who chanted “Jews will not replace us” in Charlottesville because he knew exactly what kind of energy he was feeding. He told the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by.” He stood silent when his supporters attacked the Capitol. He never denounced the “bloodbath” language, the race-war fantasies, or more recently, the Republican operatives caught in that leaked GOP group chat joking about gassing and burning Jews, Black people, and LGBTQ folks. Not one word of rebuke.

That’s because condemnation would break the spell. Trump’s power depends on keeping white grievance alive and feeding it new martyrs and new missions. Pardoning those rioters was him whispering to the faithful: You were right to fight. You were right to hate. You are still my army.

So when a pardoned man threatens to assassinate a Black leader of Congress, don’t be shocked. Call it predictable. Call it the logical outcome of a movement that treats violence as loyalty and duty. This is what happens when a president baptizes white rage instead of confronting it. The violence escalates.

And what has the president said in response to this threat against Jeffries? Not a damn thing as of 6:15 am as I’m finishing up the writing of this piece.

Not a word from Trump. Not a line from his press office. Not a flicker of condemnation from anyone in his orbit. Silence broadcasts permission.

The same man who can rage-tweet at a celebrity or fabricate a grievance over late-night TV has nothing to say about a white man he pardoned threatening to assassinate the first Black party leader in Congress. So that silence must be deciphered as endorsement. It’s a familiar performance of power through omission. It’s the same strategy he used after Charlottesville, after the Tree of Life massacre, after January 6 itself. When white terror speaks, he goes quiet so the message can linger in the air like incense.

That hush from the White House is an algorithm. It tells his followers exactly how to read the moment. No rebuke means you’re still in the fold. No apology means you’re still blessed. This is how political violence gets laundered into legitimacy through silence.

And the mainstream media is complicit too. Outlets have reported the basics of this threat against Jeffries. They’ve focused on the arrest, the texts, and the charge but stopped short of connecting the deeper pattern. Most coverage treats the threat against Jeffries as an isolated incident instead of the logical extension of Trump’s mass pardons or his long silence toward white-supremacist violence. Few outlets have named this as what it is: the aftershock of policy and not coincidence.

They’ve largely ignored the racial dimension and the fact that the first Black party leader in Congress is now the target of a man pardoned by a president who told the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by.” What’s missing is the connective tissue, and the story of cause and consequence. When journalists flatten this to “a threat,” they miss the larger crisis that political violence is no longer fringe, but state-enabled, racially coded, and publicly blessed from the top.

Trump’s quiet approval of a death warrant against a Black man leading Congress is a command. It’s the sound of a president telling his white-nationalist army the mission still stands.

If this piece moved you and you want more, I invite you to become a paid subscriber. Your $8 subscription doesn’t just keep my Substack independent and fueled, it helps me provide digital equipment, software, reporting opportunities, conference travel, and emergency funds for food and fees so these future reporters can tell the stories America tries to bury.