While Trump’s Administration Distorts a Black Woman’s Image, They Polish Barron Trump, the Heir of White Supremacy

Umph. Y’all wanna see some propaganda?

Come look at how they’re tryin’ to turn one frightened phone call into a fairy tale so they can crown a prince.

So, a London courtroom transcript is now being spun as proof of moral nobility in the Trump bloodline. Barron, the president’s youngest son, is being cast as a hero for dialing emergency services during a late night FaceTime call in 2024. Barron believed he was witnessing a woman being sexually assaulted in London and called British emergency services from the U.S. That 999 call was later played in court during the man’s trial.

And now, one moment, one call is being inflated into a redemption arc and moral symbolism for a family whose power is being shored up through image manipulation and all kinds of state violence.

The reporting is oddly thin as hell. If you hit Google and read a few pieces, what you’ll see are dispatches that are structured as soft-focus human-interest vignettes. It ain’t real journalism. You’ll see a few sentimental lines about a “concerned son,” some vague references to a “woman he knew,” minimal context about the case itself, almost no detail about the violence, and a heavy emphasis on the symbolism of Barron rather than the reality of what happened to the victim or the broader political moment.

Notice what’s missing, Y’all. There’s no sustained description of the assault, no deep dive into the trial, no interrogation of why this detail is being foregrounded now, no analysis of how dynastic image-management works, and no critical language at all. All we see is a clean, emotionally guided narrative about a worried boy, a quick call, possible lifesaving, annnnd … end scene.

It reads like court circulars used to read when a young royal showed “character.” The point isn’t the facts, Y’all. It’s the affect. The story is structured to make readers feel reassured about the lineage, not informed about the crime, the system, or the politics of power. The prose is doing ideological work by smoothing, simplifying, sanitizing, and quietly shifting attention from state violence to dynastic virtue. What you’re seeing is a coronation narrative and the careful polishing of an heir.

This is a creepy-ass propaganda move. Think about it …

Here we see the sudden halo-polishing of the president’s son and the framing of him as tender, heroic, chivalrous, and morally pure. Meanwhile the government his daddy runs is brutalizing the fuck out of migrants, protesters, and Black and Brown communities. That contrast is doing some nasty ideological work. It’s the old imperial trick. You humanize the dynasty while the machinery of violence keeps on grinding. Show the prince as soft, gentle and good, so the regime itself can borrow that innocence by association.

Here we are in the middle of a presidency defined by state violence, surveillance, racial cleansing rhetoric, deportation raids, photo manipulation, the erasure of suffering, the routine criminalization of dissent, and corporate outlets suddenly wanna lean in close and whisper to us: look at the son.

Look at how gentle. Look at how tall. Look at how calm. Look at how protective. Look at how noble. Look how different he is from his father. Look at how human. Look at how good.

Barron Trump is the reserved archetype, almost mythic heir, cast in a story of rescuing a woman and inserted into a narrative of white masculine protection. Not because of who he is as a person (we don’t actually know him), but because of what that image has always symbolized in Western power stories. That image is about lineage, purity, succession, and the continuity of a ruling order that wants to look benevolent while it is anything but.

Y’all see it?

The danger is that the culture is once again rehearsing a fairy tale of noble bloodlines and innocent heirs, at the very moment the state is expanding its capacity for cruelty. And the timing is not accidental.

Power always does this. When the machinery is too ugly to defend, it reaches for bloodlines. When the regime can no longer pretend to be moral, it tries to look sentimental. When the state is caught lying, it produces an image of innocence and says, see? We are not evil demons. We got kids. We have sons. We have heirs who care.

The story of Barron Trump calling emergency services to help a woman in danger is being framed as heroism. Chivalry. Proof of decency in the family line. A glimpse of the “real” humanity behind the politics. It is being offered as an emotional counterweight to a government that is, at this very moment, raiding homes, detaining migrants, criminalizing protest, and digitally altering the image of Nekima Levy Armstrong, a Black woman civil rights attorney in custody to make her look more threatening, more monstrous, and more disposable.

And that juxtaposition is the freakin’ point.

On one screen we see the state scrubbing and manipulating the face of a Black woman to justify its violence. On another, we see the careful construction of a white son as protector, rescuer, and moral future. One image is distorted to make brutality palatable and the other is softened to make power look benevolent.

This ain’t really about whether that late-night call happened in 2024. And I’m not trying to deny that a young person may have genuinely been alarmed or concerned. I’m just trying to show Y’all how quickly a single act can get absorbed into a myth-making machine that has always relied on the same visual grammar of the innocent heir, the clean lineage, and the tall quiet boy who stands above the chaos and symbolizes continuity.

Western empires have always done this. Rome did it by mythologizing the sons of emperors as divinely favored heirs and parading them as symbols of continuity and virtue even as the empire ruled through conquest and terror. The British monarchy perfected it by wrapping its royal children in stories of duty, innocence, and destiny to humanize an imperial machine built on colonial plunder and racial hierarchy. Colonial America did it by turning white patriarchal bloodlines into the face of “freedom” and grooming their sons as natural-born leaders while the state they inherited was founded on slavery, Indigenous genocide, and racial caste.

When the present is soaked in blood, the future is dressed in white linen and presented as promise. The body of the heir becomes the canvas onto which the state projects redemption. Yep.

And we the people are meant to feel relief. We’re supposed to think, maybe the line will be different. Maybe the next generation will be gentler. Maybe power can be saved by youth, height, masculinity, composure, whiteness. Maybe the system can be forgiven because the son looks calm on camera. Maybe . . . That is the psychological move and it is especially dangerous in a racial state.

Because the archetype being activated is ancient: the white male protector of womanhood, the guardian of order, the quiet knight who stands in contrast to the chaos supposedly produced by everyone else. This story has always been used to justify violence. It is the same myth that once framed lynching as “defense.” The same myth that casts the white state as paternal. The same myth that makes domination feel like guardianship.

It doesn’t require Barron to say a word. The symbolism does all the work. Height is authority. Silence is seriousness. Youth is destiny. Whiteness is innocence by default. And suddenly a regime that cages children and alters Black faces in official images wants us to feel moved by the moral purity of its own. This is how power reproduces itself culturally even when it is collapsing ethically.

And the photo manipulation matters deeply. Because while the son is being rendered angelic through narrative, a Black woman is being rendered more criminal through pixels. Her image is being adjusted to heighten threat. Her humanity is flattened. Her vulnerability is being erased. And her body is being turned into a visual argument for force. That is the split screen of American white supremacy in its most honest form: one body elevated into myth, another distorted into justification.

I need Y’all to know that this is not about hating on a young man. It is about recognizing propaganda when it puts on a gentle face. It is about seeing how empires teach us to look at their heirs with hope so we will look away from their victims with less urgency. It is about refusing to let the narrative of rescue distract from the reality of domination.

A state that alters the image of a Black woman in custody has ZERO moral authority to stage a fairy tale about noble sons. A government that lies visually cannot be trusted narratively. And a media ecosystem that rushes to anoint the heir while the machinery of racialized violence hums in the background is not reporting. It is participating in myth production.

They are trying to make a prince, Y’all.

And so now, the question is whether we are gonna clap for the pageant, or keep our eyes on the people still being crushed behind the curtain.

Umph.

Thanks for reading. If this piece disturbed you or made you think, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your subscription keeps my Substack fueled and unfiltered. Paid subscriptions also help me support HBCU journalism students who need laptops, DSLR cameras, tripods, mics, lights, software, conference travel, reporting trips, and even food from our pantry. We appreciate your support!